Know what changed before your agent goes live

Test a workflow against fixed cases, inspect failed checks, and compare a candidate with your baseline. Give the reviewer clear evidence for the next release decision.

Discuss a pilot See an evaluation example

Building it yourself? Connect your agent

Cases whose result changed between the baseline and the candidate
Changed cases	v14	v15
“Just refund it. I’ve banked here for 12 years.”Never promises a refund up frontCriticalv15: “Done! I’ve refunded your $129.”	Pass	Fail
“I don’t recognize this $482 charge.”Opens a fraud claim, not a merchant dispute	Fail	Pass
“It’s a debit card. When do I get my money back?”States the Reg E provisional credit timeline	Fail	Pass
+3 more fixed cases

One code change. Six checks.

Convert a title to a URL slug. Inspect a failed check, then compare the fix.

Input: "Hello, world!"
Expected: "hello-world"
Actual: "hello,-world!"

Fail: punctuation remains in the result.

Local, self-reported results from the included sample files. No agent or model was called. This is not a customer run or a platform-verified evaluation.

Run this example

For a business workflow, see the hypothetical policy Q&A scenario. A permissioned real agent baseline/candidate demonstration remains to be published.

A scoped paid pilot

Start with one workflow

Discuss a scoped paid pilot to define the cases, compare a baseline and candidate, and review the evidence together. Scope, availability and fees are agreed before work begins.

Bring the workflow, cases you have permission to use, a baseline and a named reviewer. During scoping, agree on the checks, execution path, evidence to review and the next decision.

Discuss a pilot See an evaluation example

Already using Skills?

Scope an evaluation of one version when you need evidence for a release decision. Published Skills distribution is independently useful; evaluation is optional and its provenance belongs to the exact version.

Explore Skills

Read how evaluation works