Back to prompt library
Build a Local Open-Model Speculative Decoding Configuration Planner — implementation
Linked challenge: Build a Local Open-Model Speculative Decoding Configuration Planner
Prompt source
implementation65 lines11 sectionsNo variables1 code block
## Build
Benchmark draft and target open-weight model pairings under local vLLM serving. Synthesize speedup expectations and memory trade-offs using hosted Claude, outputting validated deployment configuration schemas.
## User
Inference Optimization Specialist
## Workflow
1. Ingest model specifications for proposed target and draft open-weight models using pandas to structure parameter data.
2. Simulate theoretical latency reductions per decoding step using the formula: Speedup = 1 + (draft_tokens * acceptance_rate) - verification_overhead.
3. Invoke hosted Claude via Anthropic API to analyze memory overhead versus throughput acceleration, validating schemas with Pydantic.
4. Generate a deployment configuration payload specifying speculative draft steps and worker memory allocation.
## Interface
Interactive configuration builder yielding verified YAML parameters for open serving frameworks.
## Data
Benchmark records of token acceptance rates and latency profiles across draft-target open-weight pairings.
Starter examples below are synthetic. They are not downloaded records.
## Source
[vLLM open-model serving](https://raw.githubusercontent.com/vllm-project/vllm/main/README.md)
Leverages vLLM speculative decoding mechanisms (n-gram, draft model serving) to evaluate serving performance.
## Tools
mastra-ai, anthropic, pandas, pydantic.
Mastra AI orchestrates the evaluation workflow, chaining draft model sizing with Claude reasoning tasks.
Hosted Claude accessed through official SDK; draft/target models are open-weights only.
## Deliverables
Submit runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, a working interface, example outputs, and a recorded end-to-end demo. Include tests and an action log.
## Acceptance
- Calculates net speedup factor strictly as: 1 + (draft_tokens * assumed_acceptance_rate) - verification_overhead.
- Accounts for additional memory footprint by summing target size, draft size, and a static 20GB KV-cache overhead.
- Emits valid serving configuration blocks with Claude-generated optimization notes validated by Pydantic.
## Starter Examples
```json
[
{
"input": {
"target_gb": 140,
"draft_gb": 2,
"assumed_acceptance_rate": 0.8,
"draft_tokens": 5,
"verification_overhead": 0.5
},
"expected_output": {
"speedup_factor": 4.5,
"required_vram_gb": 162,
"viable": true,
"configuration_recommendation": "Use 5 draft tokens per speculative step. Synthetic simplified record."
}
},
{
"input": {
"target_gb": 140,
"draft_gb": 16,
"assumed_acceptance_rate": 0.6,
"draft_tokens": 4,
"verification_overhead": 0.4
},
"expected_output": {
"speedup_factor": 3,
"required_vram_gb": 176,
"viable": false,
"configuration_recommendation": "Memory requirement exceeds limits. Synthetic simplified record."
}
}
]
```
## Safety
Simulates speculative decoding configurations without deploying unmonitored local serving daemons.
Use mock external writes. Require human review before any real deployment.