Build a Local Open-Model Speculative Decoding Configuration Planner
Benchmark draft and target open-weight model pairings under local vLLM serving. Synthesize speedup expectations and memory trade-offs using hosted Claude, outputting validated deployment configuration schemas.
What you are building
The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.
Benchmark draft and target open-weight model pairings under local vLLM serving. Synthesize speedup expectations and memory trade-offs using hosted Claude, outputting validated deployment configuration schemas.
Inference Optimization Specialist
Ingest model specifications for proposed target and draft open-weight models using pandas to structure parameter data.
Simulate theoretical latency reductions per decoding step using the formula: Speedup = 1 + (draft_tokens * acceptance_rate) - verification_overhead.
Invoke hosted Claude via Anthropic API to analyze memory overhead versus throughput acceleration, validating schemas with Pydantic.
Generate a deployment configuration payload specifying speculative draft steps and worker memory allocation.
Interactive configuration builder yielding verified YAML parameters for open serving frameworks.
Benchmark records of token acceptance rates and latency profiles across draft-target open-weight pairings. Starter examples below are synthetic. They are not downloaded records.
vLLM open-model serving Leverages vLLM speculative decoding mechanisms (n-gram, draft model serving) to evaluate serving performance.
mastra-ai, anthropic, pandas, pydantic. Mastra AI orchestrates the evaluation workflow, chaining draft model sizing with Claude reasoning tasks. Hosted Claude accessed through official SDK; draft/target models are open-weights only.
Submit runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, a working interface, example outputs, and a recorded end-to-end demo. Include tests and an action log.
Calculates net speedup factor strictly as: 1 + (draft_tokens * assumed_acceptance_rate) - verification_overhead.
Accounts for additional memory footprint by summing target size, draft size, and a static 20GB KV-cache overhead.
Emits valid serving configuration blocks with Claude-generated optimization notes validated by Pydantic.
```json [ { "input": { "target_gb": 140, "draft_gb": 2, "assumed_acceptance_rate": 0.8, "draft_tokens": 5, "verification_overhead": 0.5 }, "expected_output": { "speedup_factor": 4.5, "required_vram_gb": 162, "viable": true, "configuration_recommendation": "Use 5 draft tokens per speculative step. Synthetic simplified record." } }, { "input": { "target_gb": 140, "draft_gb": 16, "assumed_acceptance_rate": 0.6, "draft_tokens": 4, "verification_overhead": 0.4 }, "expected_output": { "speedup_factor": 3, "required_vram_gb": 176, "viable": false, "configuration_recommendation": "Memory requirement exceeds limits. Synthetic simplified record." } } ] ```
Simulates speculative decoding configurations without deploying unmonitored local serving daemons. Use mock external writes. Require human review before any real deployment.
Participation guide
Simulates speculative decoding configurations without deploying unmonitored local serving daemons. Use mock external writes and human review.
How work is evaluated
Calculates net speedup factor strictly as: 1 + (draft_tokens * assumed_acceptance_rate) - verification_overhead. Accounts for additional memory footprint by summing target size, draft size, and a static 20GB KV-cache overhead. Emits valid serving configuration blocks with Claude-generated optimization notes validated by Pydantic.
Runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, working interface, example outputs, recorded demo, tests, and action logs.
Challenge datasets
Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.
How submissions are scored
These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.
Complete workflow
Ingest model specifications for proposed target and draft open-weight models using pandas to structure parameter data. Simulate theoretical latency reductions per decoding step using the formula: Speedup = 1 + (draft_tokens * acceptance_rate) - verification_overhead. Invoke hosted Claude via Anthropic API to analyze memory overhead versus throughput acceleration, validating schemas with Pydantic. Generate a deployment configuration payload specifying speculative draft steps and worker memory allocation.
Missing or incorrect.
Partly complete, with documented gaps.
Complete, with reproducible evidence.
Correctness and evidence
Calculates net speedup factor strictly as: 1 + (draft_tokens * assumed_acceptance_rate) - verification_overhead. Accounts for additional memory footprint by summing target size, draft size, and a static 20GB KV-cache overhead. Emits valid serving configuration blocks with Claude-generated optimization notes validated by Pydantic.
Missing or incorrect.
Partly complete, with documented gaps.
Complete, with reproducible evidence.
Review interface
Interactive configuration builder yielding verified YAML parameters for open serving frameworks.
Missing or incorrect.
Partly complete, with documented gaps.
Complete, with reproducible evidence.
Safe execution
Simulates speculative decoding configurations without deploying unmonitored local serving daemons.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
What you should walk away with
Ingest model specifications for proposed target and draft open-weight models using pandas to structure parameter data.
Simulate theoretical latency reductions per decoding step using the formula: Speedup = 1 + (draft_tokens * acceptance_rate) - verification_overhead.
Invoke hosted Claude via Anthropic API to analyze memory overhead versus throughput acceleration, validating schemas with Pydantic.
Generate a deployment configuration payload specifying speculative draft steps and worker memory allocation.
Reference links and supporting material
Benchmark records of token acceptance rates and latency profiles across draft-target open-weight pairings. Supplied starter examples are synthetic, not source extracts.
Challenge setup
Configuration summary for this challenge.
Challenge input
Input details are not configured.
Mastra AI
TypeScript agent framework.
Evaluated output
No output checks are configured.
- Ingest model specifications for proposed target and draft open-weight models using pandas to structure para...
- Calculates net speedup factor strictly as: 1 + (draft_tokens * assumed_acceptance_rate) - verification_over...
- Interactive configuration builder yielding verified YAML parameters for open serving frameworks.
- 2 public reference cases
- 2 configured tools
Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.
View technical recipe
Configured tools
- Mastra AI · Optional
- Mastra AI · Optional
Evaluation contract
- Complete workflow · Weight 40
- Correctness and evidence · Weight 30
- Review interface · Weight 20
- Safe execution · Weight 10
Reference cases
- 2 public reference cases
Workflow tasks
No workflow tasks are configured.
Recipe freeze marker
No recipe freeze time is recorded.