Evaluation quality depends on the cases, labels, source rights, and review history.
A large dataset is not useful when the task contract or provenance is weak.
Keep the source identity and capture time.
Store the basis for evaluation use.
Document reviewer agreement and corrections.
Do not rewrite prior evaluation results.
1. Control the comparison
Use these controls before you collect or compare results.
2. Use the procedure
Complete each step in order. Stop when a required input or control is missing.
3. Keep the evidence
Store enough evidence for another reviewer to repeat the decision.
| Record | Required evidence | Failure signal |
|---|---|---|
| Source | Stable identifier and capture record | The origin cannot be verified |
| Rights | Use class and restriction record | Evaluation use is not authorized |
| Transformation | Code or recorded operation | The source cannot be reconstructed |
| Label | Rubric, reviewer, and adjudication | Label meaning changed silently |
| Split | Membership and access control | Holdout cases entered optimization |
4. Keep the product boundary
- Do not treat synthetic data as observed user behavior.
- Do not mix unknown-provenance records into the rights-cleared corpus.
- Do not use public benchmark data as a private holdout.
- Do not delete corrected labels. Preserve the prior version and reason.