UK Planning Portal Zoning Compliance Review System using AutoGen
Municipal planning departments face massive backlogs evaluating UK building permit submittals against local plan policies. Build an AutoGen multi-agent system to cross-evaluate planning drawings, land restrictions, and heritage constraints with 92% automated validation accuracy.
What you are building
The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.
Construct an AutoGen multi-agent conversational review process simulating dialogue between a Applicant Agent, Planning Officer Agent, and Conservation Specialist Agent.
How work is evaluated
Evaluates planning application recommendation precision across permitted development and full planning permission test suites.
Challenge datasets
Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.
How submissions are scored
These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.
conservation_area_check
Ensures extensions >3m in conservation areas trigger policy conflict flag
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
decision_accuracy
Accuracy of planning decisions compared to benchmark ground truth • target: 0.92 • range: 0-1
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
What you should walk away with
Build a multi-agent conversational loop in AutoGen with dedicated role descriptions.
Parse UK planning application metadata against Use Classes Order rules.
Incorporate automated human-in-the-loop review for borderline heritage zone applications.
Achieve 92% evaluation precision compared against human planning decision records.
Reference links and supporting material
50 UK planning application case files with applicant submittals, conservation area maps, and council approval decisions.
Challenge setup
Evaluates planning application recommendation precision across permitted development and full planning permission test suites.
Challenge input
JSON containing application_type, conservation_area, height_extension_m, existing_use_class
AutoGen
Framework assignment for orchestrating multi-role dialogical reasoning.
Evaluated output
JSON with recommended_status, required_documents array, policy_conflict boolean
- Ensures extensions >3m in conservation areas trigger policy conflict flag
- Accuracy of planning decisions compared to benchmark ground truth • target: 0.92 • range: 0-1
- Benchmark: AutoGen-Gov-Bench
- Decision Accuracy target: 0.92
- 1 public reference case
- Python execution harness
- Python sandbox (unavailable on Versalist)
Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.
View technical recipe
Configured tools
- AutoGen · Required
- RAI · Optional
- Alibi Detect · Optional
Evaluation contract
- conservation_area_check · Weight 1
- decision_accuracy · Weight 1
Metrics
- decision_accuracy · Target 0.92
Benchmarks
- AutoGen-Gov-Bench
- general
Reference cases
- 1 public reference case
Workflow tasks
- Task 1
Input: JSON containing application_type, conservation_area, height_extension_m, existing_use_class
Output: JSON with recommended_status, required_documents array, policy_conflict boolean
Execution harness: Python
Evaluation tools
- AutoGen · Multi-Agent Conversational Framework
Recipe freeze marker
No recipe freeze time is recorded.