Skip to main content
Challenge

Real-time Multimodal Misinformation Shield

In light of growing concerns over misinformation on social media platforms and the potential for malicious deepfakes, this challenge focuses on developing a cutting-edge, real-time AI assistant for content moderation and misinformation detection. The system will monitor a simulated social media feed, identify multimodal content (text, image, video frames) that violates platform policies or spreads misinformation, and provide immediate alerts or suggested counter-narratives. This challenge emphasizes the integration of advanced multimodal LLMs like Claude Opus 4.5, a voice interface for rapid human intervention, and robust memory management for policy enforcement. The assistant must operate in near real-time, making accurate assessments of complex, often ambiguous, content and providing explainable justifications for its decisions.

Workflow AutomationHosted by Vera
Challenge brief

What you are building

The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.

Build a real-time multimodal misinformation detection assistant using Claude Opus 4.5, Hamming for voice interaction, and Semantic Kernel for orchestration.

Delivery guide

How work is evaluated

Evaluation

The assistant will be evaluated on its accuracy in identifying policy violations and misinformation across multimodal inputs, the relevance and speed of its alerts, and the quality of its generative responses (e.g., counter-narratives, explanations).

Datasets

Challenge datasets

Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.

Learning goals

What you should walk away with

  • Master multimodal input processing with Claude Opus 4.5, analyzing text, images, and simulated video frames for contextual understanding and policy compliance.

  • Integrate Hamming for a natural voice interface, allowing moderators to receive audio alerts and issue voice commands for real-time inquiry or action.

  • Design and orchestrate skills within Semantic Kernel to handle various moderation tasks: content analysis, policy lookup, alert generation, and counter-narrative drafting.

  • Implement a long-term memory system using Milvus to store and retrieve comprehensive policy documents, past moderation decisions, and detected misinformation campaigns, enhancing contextual understanding.

  • Utilize serverless functions (e.g., AWS Lambda, Azure Functions) to process incoming simulated social media streams in near real-time, feeding data to the Semantic Kernel agent.

  • Develop explainability features for the assistant's decisions, outlining why certain content was flagged and referencing specific policy clauses or evidence.

Resources and assets

Reference links and supporting material

Dataset notes

Sample data for 2 tasks

Challenge setup

The assistant will be evaluated on its accuracy in identifying policy violations and misinformation across multimodal inputs, the relevance and speed of its alerts, and the quality of its generative responses (e.g., c...

Challenge input

{ 'post_text': '...', 'image_url': '...', 'video_frame_url': '...' }

Agent execution

No agent tool is listed for this challenge.

Evaluated output

{ 'flagged': true/false, 'reason': '...', 'policy_violation_type': '...', 'confidence': 0.0-1.0 }

Evaluation checks
  • Correctly flag at least 90% of known misinformation/policy violations in a test set.
  • Generated counter-narrative must be rated as neutral and informative by a human expert or sentiment analysi...
Configured evaluation evidence
  • Confidence Score Average target: 0.95
Configured runtime
  • Python execution harness

Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.

View technical recipe

Configured tools

No tool records are attached.

Evaluation contract

  • Correctly flag at least 90% of known misinformation/policy violations in a test set.
  • Generated counter-narrative must be rated as neutral and informative by a human expert or sentiment analysis tool (e.g., 80% positive/neutral sentiment).

Metrics

  • Confidence Score Average · Target 0.95
  • Response Generation Latency · Target 500

Workflow tasks

  1. Task 1

    Input: { 'post_text': '...', 'image_url': '...', 'video_frame_url': '...' }

    Output: { 'flagged': true/false, 'reason': '...', 'policy_violation_type': '...', 'confidence': 0.0-1.0 }

    Execution harness: Python

  2. Task 2

    Input: { 'flagged_post': { ... }, 'policy_violation_type': '...' }

    Output: { 'explanation': '...', 'counter_narrative_suggestion': '...' }

    Execution harness: Python

Recipe freeze marker

No recipe freeze time is recorded.

Frequently Asked Questions about Real-time Multimodal Misinformation Shield