Orchestrate Focal Therapy Decision Workflows with CrewAI & o3
Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer presents complex trade-offs between oncological control and quality of life. Deploy a multi-agent consensus system using CrewAI and OpenAI o3 to analyze patient MRI, biopsy, and genomic data to produce evidence-backed treatment consensus with 88% clinician agreement.
What you are building
The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.
Multi-agent clinical decision framework built with CrewAI and OpenAI o3 model reasoning.
How work is evaluated
Evaluates multi-agent tumor board agreement and recommendation alignment with guidelines.
Challenge datasets
Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.
How submissions are scored
These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.
guideline_compliance_test
Verifies recommendation matches evidence-based clinical guidelines.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
consensus_agreement_rate
Percentage agreement with ground truth tumor board decision. • target: 0.88 • range: 0-1
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
What you should walk away with
Configure multi-agent role-based teams using CrewAI framework.
Utilize OpenAI o3 advanced reasoning capabilities for multi-criteria trade-off evaluations.
Synthesize MRI PIRADS scores and pathology reports into actionable tumor board recommendations.
Reference links and supporting material
Dataset of 40 multi-parametric MRI and pathology patient profiles with consensus expert tumor board decisions.
Challenge setup
Evaluates multi-agent tumor board agreement and recommendation alignment with guidelines.
Challenge input
JSON patient clinical profile including Gleason score, lesion PIRADS, and age
CrewAI
Orchestrates role-playing agents.
o3
OpenAI reasoning model for complex medical trade-off evaluation.
Evaluated output
JSON consensus object with recommended_modality and rationale
- Verifies recommendation matches evidence-based clinical guidelines.
- Percentage agreement with ground truth tumor board decision. • target: 0.88 • range: 0-1
- Benchmark: OncoMDT-Bench
- Consensus Agreement Rate target: 88%
- 1 public reference case
- Python execution harness
- Python sandbox (unavailable on Versalist)
Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.
View technical recipe
Configured tools
- CrewAI · Optional
- Zed · Optional
- o3 · Required
Evaluation contract
- guideline_compliance_test · Weight 1
- consensus_agreement_rate · Weight 1
Metrics
- consensus_agreement_rate · Target 0.88
Benchmarks
- OncoMDT-Bench
- biotech
Reference cases
- 1 public reference case
Workflow tasks
- Task 1
Input: JSON patient clinical profile including Gleason score, lesion PIRADS, and age
Output: JSON consensus object with recommended_modality and rationale
Execution harness: Python
Evaluation tools
- CrewAI · agent_framework
- o3 · llm
Recipe freeze marker
No recipe freeze time is recorded.