Offshore Field Expansion Multi-Agent System with CrewAI
Offshore engineering consortia require collaborative evaluation of EPC contract bids across technical, commercial, and local content metrics. Build a multi-agent bidding evaluation swarm using CrewAI where specialized agents analyze bid submissions.
What you are building
The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.
Orchestrate role-playing CrewAI agents (Technical Auditor, Cost Estimator, Compliance Officer) to analyze complex offshore bids.
How work is evaluated
Evaluates multi-agent score output consistency and trade-off synthesis in offshore tender reviews.
Challenge datasets
Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.
How submissions are scored
These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.
score_range_check
Verifies composite score falls between 0 and 100.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
consensus_agreement
Degree of alignment between agent scores and benchmark ground truth. • target: 0.94 • range: 0-1
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
What you should walk away with
Define collaborative Agent roles and Goals using CrewAI
Set up sequential and hierarchical Task execution pipelines
Integrate custom search and procurement analysis tools
Produce consolidated EPC bidder scorecards with executive recommendations
Reference links and supporting material
Offshore platform engineering proposals, jacket procurement costs, and ICV (In-Country Value) breakdown scores for Qatar offshore expansions.
Challenge setup
Evaluates multi-agent score output consistency and trade-off synthesis in offshore tender reviews.
Challenge input
JSON containing bidder_name, technical_spec_compliance_pct, and bid_price_usd_m
CrewAI
Framework for multi-agent role-playing and collaboration.
Evaluated output
JSON with winning_bidder, composite_score, and primary_rationale
- Verifies composite score falls between 0 and 100.
- Degree of alignment between agent scores and benchmark ground truth. • target: 0.94 • range: 0-1
- Benchmark: Procurement-Consensus-Eval
- Consensus Agreement target: 0.94
- 1 public reference case
- Python execution harness
- Python sandbox (unavailable on Versalist)
Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.
View technical recipe
Configured tools
- CrewAI · Required
- crewAI · Optional
- Zed · Optional
Evaluation contract
- score_range_check · Weight 1
- consensus_agreement · Weight 1
Metrics
- consensus_agreement · Target 0.94
Benchmarks
- Procurement-Consensus-Eval
- general
Reference cases
- 1 public reference case
Workflow tasks
- Task 1
Input: JSON containing bidder_name, technical_spec_compliance_pct, and bid_price_usd_m
Output: JSON with winning_bidder, composite_score, and primary_rationale
Execution harness: Python
Evaluation tools
- CrewAI · agent_framework
Recipe freeze marker
No recipe freeze time is recorded.