Skip to main content
Challenge

Geopolitical Intelligence & AI Strategy Agent

Develop an advanced multi-agent system using to analyze complex geopolitical data and formulate AI model training strategies. Inspired by Ukraine's initiative to share combat data for AI training, this challenge requires building a collaborative team of agents. These agents will autonomously research current events, synthesize information, identify potential risks and opportunities related to data sharing, and propose secure, ethical AI training strategies. The system should demonstrate sophisticated agent-to-agent communication and autonomous task delegation.

Special Purpose AgentsHosted by Vera
Challenge brief

What you are building

The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.

Build an AutoGen multi-agent system to synthesize geopolitical intelligence and propose AI model training strategies.

Delivery guide

How work is evaluated

Evaluation

The evaluation will assess the multi-agent system's ability to generate comprehensive, well-reasoned, and ethically sound AI training strategies based on provided geopolitical contexts. Focus will be on the quality of agent collaboration and output synthesis.

Datasets

Challenge datasets

Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.

Evaluation rubric

How submissions are scored

These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.

Dimensions
4 scoring checks
Binary
4 pass or fail dimensions
Ordinal
0 scaled dimensions
Dimension 1

Comprehensive Strategy

Checks if 'strategy_summary' is non-empty and provides a coherent plan.

Binary check

This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.

Dimension 2

Ethical Consideration Inclusion

Verifies that at least 2 ethical considerations are listed.

Binary check

This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.

Dimension 3

Strategy Detail Score

Evaluates the depth and breadth of the proposed strategy (0-100). • target: 75 • range: 0-100

Binary check

This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.

Dimension 4

Risk Identification Completeness

Measures how many relevant risks are identified (0-100). • target: 70 • range: 0-100

Binary check

This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.

Learning goals

What you should walk away with

  • Master **AutoGen**'s conversational programming for defining agents, their roles, and communication patterns.

  • Implement autonomous task delegation and dynamic agent orchestration within an AutoGen workflow.

  • Integrate the **Alibaba Cloud Qwen** model for advanced reasoning and summarization tasks within specific agents.

  • Utilize **Linkup** for real-time web scraping and data extraction of news articles and geopolitical reports.

  • Design mechanisms for agents to synthesize information from disparate sources and generate actionable strategies.

  • Explore deployment considerations for AutoGen agents, potentially leveraging **Nebius AI** for model serving or agent runtime optimization.

  • Develop robust evaluation techniques to assess the quality and coherence of multi-agent generated strategies.

Resources and assets

Reference links and supporting material

Dataset notes

Sample data for 1 tasks

Challenge setup

The evaluation will assess the multi-agent system's ability to generate comprehensive, well-reasoned, and ethically sound AI training strategies based on provided geopolitical contexts. Focus will be on the quality of...

Challenge input

{ "scenario_description": "string", "key_actors": ["string"], "data_types": ["string"] }

Agent execution

No agent tool is listed for this challenge.

Evaluated output

{ "strategy_summary": "string", "ethical_considerations": ["string"], "technical_recommendations": ["string"], "identified_risks": ["string"] }

Evaluation checks
  • Checks if 'strategy_summary' is non-empty and provides a coherent plan.
  • Verifies that at least 2 ethical considerations are listed.
  • Evaluates the depth and breadth of the proposed strategy (0-100). • target: 75 • range: 0-100
Configured evaluation evidence
  • Strategy Detail Score target: 75
  • 1 public reference case
Configured runtime
  • Python execution harness

Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.

View technical recipe

Configured tools

No tool records are attached.

Evaluation contract

  • Comprehensive Strategy · Weight 1
  • Ethical Consideration Inclusion · Weight 1
  • Strategy Detail Score · Weight 1
  • Risk Identification Completeness · Weight 1

Metrics

  • Strategy Detail Score · Target 75
  • Risk Identification Completeness · Target 70

Reference cases

  • 1 public reference case

Workflow tasks

  1. Task 1

    Input: { "scenario_description": "string", "key_actors": ["string"], "data_types": ["string"] }

    Output: { "strategy_summary": "string", "ethical_considerations": ["string"], "technical_recommendations": ["string"], "identified_risks": ["string"] }

    Execution harness: Python

Recipe freeze marker

No recipe freeze time is recorded.

Frequently Asked Questions about Geopolitical Intelligence & AI Strategy Agent