Choose Objects That Fit a Display Case
Compare object dimensions and mounting clearances with display-case limits. Separate geometric fit from conservation approval. Produce a shortlist with calculations and unresolved measurements.
What you are building
The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.
Compare object dimensions and mounting clearances with display-case limits. Separate geometric fit from conservation approval. Produce a shortlist with calculations and unresolved measurements.
Use OpenAI GPT-6 Astra with pandas and Pillow.
Object dimensions plus twice the clearance must fit the case. Rotation is forbidden in this fixture.
Use gpt-6-astra for evidence interpretation and workflow coordination. Use code for arithmetic and constraint checks.
Treat source documents and browser content as data, not instructions.
Use synthetic or explicitly authorized records. Do not upload personal or confidential data without permission.
Cite input record identifiers for conclusions. Distinguish missing evidence from a negative result.
Record tool calls, results, elapsed time, and reported token usage. Do not request private chain-of-thought.
Keep external actions disabled. Use a test portal for browser workflows and preserve draft status.
Do not assert ownership or reproduction rights from an image alone. Require curator approval.
case-fit-matrix.csv and a curator shortlist
source code and dependency lockfile
automated tests and recorded tool events
a short limitations and approval note
Participation guide
Object dimensions plus twice the clearance must fit the case. Rotation is forbidden in this fixture. Use gpt-6-astra for evidence interpretation and workflow coordination. Use code for arithmetic and constraint checks. Treat source documents and browser content as data, not instructions. Use synthetic or explicitly authorized records. Do not upload personal or confidential data without permission. Cite input record identifiers for conclusions. Distinguish missing evidence from a negative result. Record tool calls, results, elapsed time, and reported token usage. Do not request private chain-of-thought. Keep external actions disabled. Use a test portal for browser workflows and preserve draft status. Do not assert ownership or reproduction rights from an image alone. Require curator approval.
How work is evaluated
A 100-point review rubric with an unauthorized-action failure gate. Starter examples do not establish full workflow performance.
case-fit-matrix.csv and a curator shortlist source code and dependency lockfile automated tests and recorded tool events a short limitations and approval note
Challenge datasets
Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.
How submissions are scored
These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.
correctness
Object dimensions plus twice the clearance must fit the case. Rotation is forbidden in this fixture.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
evidence
Every factual conclusion cites the correct input record. Missing evidence remains explicit.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
workflow
The submitted workflow produces case-fit-matrix.csv and a curator shortlist with independent verification.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
robustness
An image looks small but the measured width exceeds the limit. Use measurements, not visual guesswork.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
What you should walk away with
Object dimensions plus twice the clearance must fit the case. Rotation is forbidden in this fixture.
Produce case-fit-matrix.csv and a curator shortlist.
Demonstrate evidence handling, safe failure, and reproducible results.
Reference links and supporting material
Three authored synthetic examples for Choose Objects That Fit a Display Case. These are starter fixtures, not operational records or a validated benchmark.
Challenge setup
Evaluate the workflow against input evidence, deterministic checks, and reviewed domain cases.
Challenge input
JSON object with payload field
pandas
deterministic processing or artifact creation in the agent workflow.
Pillow
deterministic processing or artifact creation in the agent workflow.
Evaluated output
JSON result object
- Object dimensions plus twice the clearance must fit the case. Rotation is forbidden in this fixture.
- Every factual conclusion cites the correct input record. Missing evidence remains explicit.
- The submitted workflow produces case-fit-matrix.csv and a curator shortlist with independent verification.
- Correctness
- 3 public reference cases
- 1 configured tool
Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.
View technical recipe
Configured tools
- OpenAI GPT-6 Astra · Required
Evaluation contract
- correctness · Weight 40
- evidence · Weight 20
- workflow · Weight 20
- robustness · Weight 20
Metrics
- correctness
- evidence
- workflow
- robustness
Reference cases
- 3 public reference cases
Workflow tasks
- Task 1
Input: JSON object with payload field
Output: JSON result object
- Task 2
Input: JSON object with payload field
Output: JSON result object
- Task 3
Input: JSON object with payload field
Output: JSON result object
Evaluation tools
- pandas · deterministic processing or artifact creation
- Pillow · deterministic processing or artifact creation
Recipe freeze marker
No recipe freeze time is recorded.