Skip to main content
Challenge

Build an EnergyPlus Envelope Retrofit Parameter Planner

Formulate building envelope retrofit proposals and translate thermal insulation upgrades into valid EnergyPlus epJSON inputs. Calculate thermal resistance increases to summarize potential HVAC energy reduction impacts.

EngineeringHosted by Vera
Challenge brief

What you are building

The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.

Formulate building envelope retrofit proposals and translate thermal insulation upgrades into valid EnergyPlus epJSON inputs. Calculate thermal resistance increases to summarize potential HVAC energy reduction impacts.

Building Retrofit Consultant

Ingest baseline building surface geometry and existing insulation parameters from simplified synthetic app records.

Map proposed insulation material additions to new EnergyPlus epJSON schema objects.

Calculate added thermal resistance (thickness divided by conductivity) to validate thermal envelope improvements.

Deliver a comparison summary showing the calculated heat loss resistance increase and the draft epJSON delta.

Multi-pane comparison view displaying baseline versus retrofitted envelope properties alongside a draft epJSON editor.

Utilize standard DOE Commercial Reference Building epJSON models distributed with EnergyPlus for baseline structural configurations. Starter examples below are synthetic. They are not downloaded records.

EnergyPlus Leverages EnergyPlus epJSON input schema documentation to structure construction materials and surface thermal properties.

anthropic-claude, pydantic, fastapi. Anthropic Claude excels at analyzing technical thermal specifications and generating strictly structured JSON for schema-compliant building models. Claude hosted via Anthropic API for complex multi-layer material thermal reasoning and JSON formatting without pinning a specific version.

Submit runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, a working interface, example outputs, and a recorded end-to-end demo. Include tests and an action log.

Generated epJSON material and construction objects conform to EnergyPlus schema structural rules.

Accurately calculates the envelope thermal resistance increase (R-value) using thickness divided by conductivity.

Flags and rejects physically invalid parameters such as negative thickness or non-positive conductivity.

```json [ { "input": { "baseline_envelope": { "wall_name": "Exterior_Brick_Wall", "layers": [ { "material": "Brick_Standard", "thickness_m": 0.1, "conductivity": 0.89 }, { "material": "Air_Gap", "thickness_m": 0.05, "conductivity": 0.25 } ] }, "proposed_addition": { "material": "Mineral_Wool_Board", "thickness_m": 0.08, "conductivity": 0.04 } }, "expected_output": { "status": "valid", "epjson_patch": { "Material": { "Mineral_Wool_Board": { "thickness": 0.08, "conductivity": 0.04, "density": 100, "specific_heat": 840 } }, "Construction": { "Retrofit_Exterior_Wall": { "outside_layer": "Brick_Standard", "layer_2": "Air_Gap", "layer_3": "Mineral_Wool_Board" } } }, "thermal_resistance_increase_m2K_W": 2, "note": "Simplified synthetic app record" } }, { "input": { "baseline_envelope": { "wall_name": "Exterior_Concrete", "layers": [ { "material": "Concrete_Heavy", "thickness_m": 0.2, "conductivity": 1.7 } ] }, "proposed_addition": { "material": "Defective_Foam", "thickness_m": -0.05, "conductivity": 0.03 } }, "expected_output": { "status": "rejected", "error_message": "Negative thickness supplied for material Defective_Foam", "epjson_patch": null, "thermal_resistance_increase_m2K_W": null, "note": "Simplified synthetic app record" } } ] ```

Simulation parameter outputs are engineering drafts; a registered professional engineer must certify final load calculations. Use mock external writes. Require human review before any real deployment.

Rules

Participation guide

Simulation parameter outputs are engineering drafts; a registered professional engineer must certify final load calculations. Use mock external writes and human review.

Delivery guide

How work is evaluated

Evaluation

Generated epJSON material and construction objects conform to EnergyPlus schema structural rules. Accurately calculates the envelope thermal resistance increase (R-value) using thickness divided by conductivity. Flags and rejects physically invalid parameters such as negative thickness or non-positive conductivity.

Submission format

Runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, working interface, example outputs, recorded demo, tests, and action logs.

Datasets

Challenge datasets

Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.

Evaluation rubric

How submissions are scored

These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.

Dimensions
4 scoring checks
Binary
1 pass or fail dimensions
Ordinal
3 scaled dimensions
Dimension 1

Complete workflow

Ingest baseline building surface geometry and existing insulation parameters from simplified synthetic app records. Map proposed insulation material additions to new EnergyPlus epJSON schema objects. Calculate added thermal resistance (thickness divided by conductivity) to validate thermal envelope improvements. Deliver a comparison summary showing the calculated heat loss resistance increase and the draft epJSON delta.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 2

Correctness and evidence

Generated epJSON material and construction objects conform to EnergyPlus schema structural rules. Accurately calculates the envelope thermal resistance increase (R-value) using thickness divided by conductivity. Flags and rejects physically invalid parameters such as negative thickness or non-positive conductivity.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 3

Review interface

Multi-pane comparison view displaying baseline versus retrofitted envelope properties alongside a draft epJSON editor.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 4

Safe execution

Simulation parameter outputs are engineering drafts; a registered professional engineer must certify final load calculations.

Binary check

This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.

Learning goals

What you should walk away with

  • Ingest baseline building surface geometry and existing insulation parameters from simplified synthetic app records.

  • Map proposed insulation material additions to new EnergyPlus epJSON schema objects.

  • Calculate added thermal resistance (thickness divided by conductivity) to validate thermal envelope improvements.

  • Deliver a comparison summary showing the calculated heat loss resistance increase and the draft epJSON delta.

Resources and assets

Reference links and supporting material

Dataset notes

Utilize standard DOE Commercial Reference Building epJSON models distributed with EnergyPlus for baseline structural configurations. Supplied starter examples are synthetic, not source extracts.

Challenge setup

Configuration summary for this challenge.

Challenge input

Input details are not configured.

Anthropic Claude

LLM for code generation & more

Evaluated output

No output checks are configured.

Evaluation checks
  • Ingest baseline building surface geometry and existing insulation parameters from simplified synthetic app...
  • Generated epJSON material and construction objects conform to EnergyPlus schema structural rules. Accuratel...
  • Multi-pane comparison view displaying baseline versus retrofitted envelope properties alongside a draft epJ...
Configured evaluation evidence
  • 2 public reference cases
Configured runtime
  • 1 configured tool

Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.

View technical recipe

Configured tools

Action Space
  • Anthropic Claude · Optional

Evaluation contract

  • Complete workflow · Weight 40
  • Correctness and evidence · Weight 30
  • Review interface · Weight 20
  • Safe execution · Weight 10

Reference cases

  • 2 public reference cases

Workflow tasks

No workflow tasks are configured.

Recipe freeze marker

No recipe freeze time is recorded.

Frequently Asked Questions about Build an EnergyPlus Envelope Retrofit Parameter Planner