Build an AutoGen Multi-Agent Dynamic Payment Routing Engine
Complex multi-rail payment ecosystems fail due to unoptimized gateway latency, failure rates, and interchange fees. Build a dynamic multi-agent system with AutoGen where negotiator, cost-optimizer, and compliance agents collaborate to route cross-border payments with 15% cost savings.
What you are building
The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.
Deploy an AutoGen multi-agent conversational loop to negotiate dynamic end-to-end payment routing under changing rail constraints.
How work is evaluated
Evaluates cost reduction percentage, route success rate, and multi-agent interaction efficiency.
Challenge datasets
Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.
How submissions are scored
These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.
valid_rail_selection_test
Selected rail must fulfill specified latency SLA.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
cost_saving_percentage
Percentage reduction in processing fees vs default route. • target: 0.15 • range: 0.05-0.3
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
What you should walk away with
Build collaborative multi-agent conversations using Microsoft AutoGen
Implement Dynamic Group Chat patterns for payment gateway selection
Optimize end-to-end routing decisions across fee, latency, and SLA parameters
Incorporate human-in-the-loop intervention thresholds for high-value transactions
Reference links and supporting material
Dataset of multi-rail payment scenarios with varying transaction volumes, fees, and latency constraints.
Challenge setup
Evaluates cost reduction percentage, route success rate, and multi-agent interaction efficiency.
Challenge input
JSON payment routing request detailing currency, speed priority, and max fee
AutoGen
Enables multi-agent conversational patterns and dynamic group collaboration.
Evaluated output
JSON containing selected rail, fee breakdown, and agent chat trace
- Selected rail must fulfill specified latency SLA.
- Percentage reduction in processing fees vs default route. • target: 0.15 • range: 0.05-0.3
- Benchmark: Multi-Agent Optimization Benchmark
- Cost Saving Percentage target: 0.15
- 1 public reference case
- Python execution harness
- Python sandbox (unavailable on Versalist)
Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.
View technical recipe
Configured tools
- AutoGen · Required
- Microsoft AutoGen · Optional
Evaluation contract
- valid_rail_selection_test · Weight 1
- cost_saving_percentage · Weight 1
Metrics
- cost_saving_percentage · Target 0.15
Benchmarks
- Multi-Agent Optimization Benchmark
- general
Reference cases
- 1 public reference case
Workflow tasks
- Task 1
Input: JSON payment routing request detailing currency, speed priority, and max fee
Output: JSON containing selected rail, fee breakdown, and agent chat trace
Execution harness: Python
Evaluation tools
- AutoGen · Multi-Agent Framework
Recipe freeze marker
No recipe freeze time is recorded.