Build an Accelerator Procurement Capacity and Cost Simulation Engine
Model multi-accelerator cloud procurement strategies against projected generative AI inference demands. Evaluate cost tradeoffs between spot, on-demand, and reserved capacity under preemption risk.
What you are building
The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.
Model multi-accelerator cloud procurement strategies against projected generative AI inference demands. Evaluate cost tradeoffs between spot, on-demand, and reserved capacity under preemption risk.
Cloud FinOps Architect
Ingest projected hourly token request demand and model parameter specifications.
Simulate provisioning across AWS Neuron instances and NVIDIA GPU cloud offerings.
Prompt hosted Claude to evaluate risk-adjusted cost matrices and spot preemption exposure.
Generate a procurement portfolio report with cost savings and availability guarantees.
Scenario comparison dashboard displaying cost curves, preemption vulnerability graphs, and allocation tables.
Construct synthetic hourly demand profiles and pricing tables for accelerated EC2 instances (Inf2, Trn1, and GPU equivalents). Starter examples below are synthetic. They are not downloaded records.
AWS Neuron documentation Utilizes AWS Neuron accelerated EC2 instance family specifications (Inf1, Inf2, Trn1, Trn2) for architectural cost modeling.
pydantic-ai, anthropic-claude, mlflow. Enforces strict financial schema validation and constraint checking on simulated procurement allocations. Hosted Claude API for narrative tradeoff analysis between reservation commitments and spot preemption costs.
Submit runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, a working interface, example outputs, and a recorded end-to-end demo. Include tests and an action log.
Simulates multi-tier procurement models satisfying peak hourly token demand.
Quantifies potential cost savings and preemption interruption probabilities.
Outputs structured JSON procurement allocations conforming to schema guidelines.
```json [ { "input": { "monthly_demand_tokens_billion": 50, "target_model": "Llama-70B", "latency_sla_ms": 100, "budget_limit_usd": 25000 }, "expected_output": { "recommended_fleet": [ { "instance_type": "trn1.32xlarge", "pricing_model": "1yr_reserved", "count": 4, "monthly_cost_usd": 14200 }, { "instance_type": "inf2.48xlarge", "pricing_model": "spot_flexible", "count": 2, "monthly_cost_usd": 4800 } ], "total_monthly_usd": 19000, "projected_sla_conformance_pct": 99.4, "risk_commentary": "Reserved Trn1 provides steady baseline; spot Inf2 absorbs morning bursts" } }, { "input": { "monthly_demand_tokens_billion": 1, "target_model": "Qwen-7B", "latency_sla_ms": 500, "budget_limit_usd": 2000 }, "expected_output": { "recommended_fleet": [ { "instance_type": "inf2.xlarge", "pricing_model": "on_demand", "count": 2, "monthly_cost_usd": 980 } ], "total_monthly_usd": 980, "projected_sla_conformance_pct": 99.9, "risk_commentary": "Low volume easily accommodated on demand without reservation risk" } } ] ```
Procurement simulation only; executes no cloud API provisioning or financial transactions. Use mock external writes. Require human review before any real deployment.
Participation guide
Procurement simulation only; executes no cloud API provisioning or financial transactions. Use mock external writes and human review.
How work is evaluated
Simulates multi-tier procurement models satisfying peak hourly token demand. Quantifies potential cost savings and preemption interruption probabilities. Outputs structured JSON procurement allocations conforming to schema guidelines.
Runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, working interface, example outputs, recorded demo, tests, and action logs.
Challenge datasets
Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.
How submissions are scored
These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.
Complete workflow
Ingest projected hourly token request demand and model parameter specifications. Simulate provisioning across AWS Neuron instances and NVIDIA GPU cloud offerings. Prompt hosted Claude to evaluate risk-adjusted cost matrices and spot preemption exposure. Generate a procurement portfolio report with cost savings and availability guarantees.
Missing or incorrect.
Partly complete, with documented gaps.
Complete, with reproducible evidence.
Correctness and evidence
Simulates multi-tier procurement models satisfying peak hourly token demand. Quantifies potential cost savings and preemption interruption probabilities. Outputs structured JSON procurement allocations conforming to schema guidelines.
Missing or incorrect.
Partly complete, with documented gaps.
Complete, with reproducible evidence.
Review interface
Scenario comparison dashboard displaying cost curves, preemption vulnerability graphs, and allocation tables.
Missing or incorrect.
Partly complete, with documented gaps.
Complete, with reproducible evidence.
Safe execution
Procurement simulation only; executes no cloud API provisioning or financial transactions.
This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.
What you should walk away with
Ingest projected hourly token request demand and model parameter specifications.
Simulate provisioning across AWS Neuron instances and NVIDIA GPU cloud offerings.
Prompt hosted Claude to evaluate risk-adjusted cost matrices and spot preemption exposure.
Generate a procurement portfolio report with cost savings and availability guarantees.
Reference links and supporting material
Construct synthetic hourly demand profiles and pricing tables for accelerated EC2 instances (Inf2, Trn1, and GPU equivalents). Supplied starter examples are synthetic, not source extracts.
Challenge setup
Configuration summary for this challenge.
Challenge input
Input details are not configured.
Pydantic AI
Typed Python agent framework.
Evaluated output
No output checks are configured.
- Ingest projected hourly token request demand and model parameter specifications. Simulate provisioning acro...
- Simulates multi-tier procurement models satisfying peak hourly token demand. Quantifies potential cost savi...
- Scenario comparison dashboard displaying cost curves, preemption vulnerability graphs, and allocation tables.
- 2 public reference cases
- 2 configured tools
Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.
View technical recipe
Configured tools
- Pydantic AI · Optional
- Pydantic AI · Optional
Evaluation contract
- Complete workflow · Weight 40
- Correctness and evidence · Weight 30
- Review interface · Weight 20
- Safe execution · Weight 10
Reference cases
- 2 public reference cases
Workflow tasks
No workflow tasks are configured.
Recipe freeze marker
No recipe freeze time is recorded.