Skip to main content
Challenge

Build a Preferred Financing Backsolve and Identification Console

Investigate total equity values consistent with a financing price and specified investor rights. Separate primary financing evidence from secondary sales and unsupported valuation shortcuts.

section-409aHosted by Vera
Challenge brief

What you are building

The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.

A valuation specialist assessing recent financing evidence.

Investigate total equity values consistent with a financing price and specified investor rights. Separate primary financing evidence from secondary sales and unsupported valuation shortcuts.

Key: transaction_id + security_class + rights_version.

Fields: observed_price, units, primary_or_secondary, transaction_date, rights, calibration_parameters.

Document nonprice consideration and missing terms. Do not infer common value from preferred price alone.

Determine which transaction terms are supported by evidence.

Calibrate a forward allocation model to the observed security price.

Test parameter bounds and alternative rights interpretations.

Export residuals and an identification limitations report.

A transaction evidence viewer with calibration controls and multiple feasible valuation results.

A bounded calibration service using the approved allocation engine.

A financing evidence memo with a complete parameter and rights history.

Runnable local application, setup commands, and a dependency lockfile.

Versioned input data, data dictionary, acquisition instructions, and rights notes.

Calculation traces, source references, assumption records, and exported review artifacts.

A deterministic baseline and tests for normal, incomplete, contradictory, and failure-recovery cases.

A recorded complete workflow with a reproducible manifest and explicit limitations.

Forward pricing of the calibrated class matches its target within the stated tolerance.

One transaction cannot identify several unconstrained parameters.

Secondary trades remain separately labeled.

A change in rights invalidates an unchanged-price calibration assumption.

In the illustrative linear calibration, identical security proceeds imply different total equity when the supplied rights adjustment changes.

The attached starter files are prototype inputs. Expected starter answers are visible. They are not independent holdouts.

Full target: Create fictional preferred financing documents, transaction prices, side letters, and cap tables. Include a secondary sale with different rights and transaction circumstances.

Complete target contracts and expert review remain pending. Public observations are not historical release vintages.

SciPy, pandas, Streamlit

Use an available model appropriate to the task. Record provider, model identifier, version or retrieval date, settings, cost, and latency. Use deterministic code for calculations. Models may extract, retrieve, or explain evidence. They must not invent missing records, override approval rules, or claim professional authority.

The linear fixture is a toy calibration, not an economically complete preferred-stock pricing formula.

No fabricated records, source citations, professional endorsements, or expert-adjudication claims.

No future-data leakage into dated decisions, model fitting, or historical valuation inputs.

No unauthorized payments, account restrictions, regulatory filings, or production changes.

No automated appraisal certification, tax-compliance determination, or unsupported fraud accusation.

No concealed uncertainty or silently invented inputs required for a numerical conclusion.

Correct domain calculations and justified methods with documented assumptions. Weight: 30.

Source lineage, temporal integrity, rights checks, and explicit synthetic-data labels. Weight: 25.

A working application with review, export, error handling, and reproducible state. Weight: 20.

Adversarial cases, uncertainty, missing-data behavior, and sensitivity analysis. Weight: 15.

Evidence-linked conclusions that distinguish facts, assumptions, and unresolved judgments. Weight: 10. Score each dimension from zero to two. Weighted score = sum(weight * score / 2). A failed safety gate blocks acceptance.

Rules

Participation guide

The linear fixture is a toy calibration, not an economically complete preferred-stock pricing formula. No fabricated records, source citations, professional endorsements, or expert-adjudication claims. No future-data leakage into dated decisions, model fitting, or historical valuation inputs. No unauthorized payments, account restrictions, regulatory filings, or production changes. No automated appraisal certification, tax-compliance determination, or unsupported fraud accusation. No concealed uncertainty or silently invented inputs required for a numerical conclusion.

Delivery guide

How work is evaluated

Evaluation

100-point weighted review with safety gates. Visible starter cases do not establish full application correctness.

Submission format

A bounded calibration service using the approved allocation engine. A financing evidence memo with a complete parameter and rights history. Runnable local application, setup commands, and a dependency lockfile. Versioned input data, data dictionary, acquisition instructions, and rights notes. Calculation traces, source references, assumption records, and exported review artifacts. A deterministic baseline and tests for normal, incomplete, contradictory, and failure-recovery cases. A recorded complete workflow with a reproducible manifest and explicit limitations.

Datasets

Challenge datasets

Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.

Evaluation rubric

How submissions are scored

These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.

Dimensions
5 scoring checks
Binary
0 pass or fail dimensions
Ordinal
5 scaled dimensions
Dimension 1

Score scale
012
Dimension 2

Score scale
012
Dimension 3

Score scale
012
Dimension 4

Score scale
012
Dimension 5

Score scale
012
Learning goals

What you should walk away with

  • Determine which transaction terms are supported by evidence.

  • Calibrate a forward allocation model to the observed security price.

  • Test parameter bounds and alternative rights interpretations.

  • Export residuals and an identification limitations report.

Resources and assets

Reference links and supporting material

Dataset notes

1 attached dataset file(s), including two visible synthetic starter cases. Complete target data remains pending.

Challenge setup

Configuration summary for this challenge.

Challenge input

Input details are not configured.

Agent execution

No agent tool is listed for this challenge.

Evaluated output

No output checks are configured.

Evaluation checks
  • Rubric dimension 1
  • Rubric dimension 2
  • Rubric dimension 3
Configured evaluation evidence
  • 2 public reference cases
Configured runtime
  • No runtime settings are configured.

Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.

View technical recipe

Configured tools

No tool records are attached.

Evaluation contract

  • Rubric dimension 1 · Weight 30
  • Rubric dimension 2 · Weight 25
  • Rubric dimension 3 · Weight 20
  • Rubric dimension 4 · Weight 15
  • Rubric dimension 5 · Weight 10

Reference cases

  • 2 public reference cases

Workflow tasks

No workflow tasks are configured.

Recipe freeze marker

No recipe freeze time is recorded.

Frequently Asked Questions about Build a Preferred Financing Backsolve and Identification Console