Build a Lease-Adjusted Valuation Comparability Desk
Compare lease-heavy businesses under consistent operating and financing conventions. Detect double counting between lease liabilities, rent adjustments, and cash-flow forecasts.
What you are building
Two peers report leases differently. Build a comparison that treats rent, lease liabilities, and forecast cash payments consistently. The starter discounts one payment of 105 at 5% to 100. Trace each adjustment and show where counting rent and the financing claim twice would distort the comparison.
Rules
Analytical normalization is not a substitute for the applicable accounting standard. No fabricated records, source citations, professional endorsements, or expert-adjudication claims. No future-data leakage into dated decisions, model fitting, or historical valuation inputs. No unauthorized payments, account restrictions, regulatory filings, or production changes. No automated appraisal certification, tax-compliance determination, or unsupported fraud accusation. No concealed uncertainty or silently invented inputs required for a numerical conclusion.
How work is evaluated
100-point weighted review with safety gates. Visible starter cases do not establish full application correctness.
A lease cash-flow and convention reconciliation module. A peer-comparison workbook with accounting-to-analytical bridges. Runnable local application, setup commands, and a dependency lockfile. Versioned input data, data dictionary, acquisition instructions, and rights notes. Calculation traces, source references, assumption records, and exported review artifacts. A deterministic baseline and tests for normal, incomplete, contradictory, and failure-recovery cases. A recorded complete workflow with a reproducible manifest and explicit limitations.
Datasets
Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.
How submissions are scored
Learning goals
Extract schedules and identify omitted payment detail.
Apply one consistent lease convention per comparison.
Reconcile adjusted operating metrics with the enterprise-value bridge.
Export convention differences and double-counting warnings.
Resources
2 attached datasets, including two visible synthetic starter cases. The fixture ZIP supplies synthetic exercise inputs. It does not supply independently verified real-world records.
Challenge setup
Challenge input
Input details are not configured.
Agent execution
No agent tool is listed for this challenge.
Evaluated output
No output checks are configured.
- Rubric dimension 1
- Rubric dimension 2
- Rubric dimension 3
- 2 public reference cases
- No runtime settings are configured.
Shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items.
View technical recipe
Configured tools
No tool records are attached.
Evaluation contract
- Rubric dimension 1 · Weight 30
- Rubric dimension 2 · Weight 25
- Rubric dimension 3 · Weight 20
- Rubric dimension 4 · Weight 15
- Rubric dimension 5 · Weight 10
Reference cases
- 2 public reference cases
Workflow tasks
No workflow tasks are configured.
Recipe freeze marker
No recipe freeze time is recorded.