Skip to main content
Challenge

Build a Chronological Ledger Narrative and Documentary Missing-Link Annotator

Draft chronological narrative summaries from normalized account ledgers. Highlight critical documentary omissions by cross-referencing tabular completeness against provided supporting invoices and contracts.

CybersecurityHosted by Vera
Challenge brief

What you are building

The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.

Draft chronological narrative summaries from normalized account ledgers. Highlight critical documentary omissions by cross-referencing tabular completeness against provided supporting invoices and contracts.

Financial Crime Case Preparer

Ingest simplified normalized ledger entries containing sender, receiver, timestamp, and purpose fields.

Validate ledger tabular completeness against required schema fields using Frictionless Data, focusing on attachment references.

Draft an objective chronological narrative describing the fund flow sequence across all verified accounts.

Compile an explicit list of missing-link annotations where tabular records lack corresponding external documentary references.

A two-pane narrative review window with editable summary paragraphs alongside flagged tabular missing-link annotations.

Generate synthetic business transaction batches with deliberately omitted supporting invoice references and transport documents to test missing-link detection. Starter examples below are synthetic. They are not downloaded records.

Frictionless data validation Frictionless Data validation concepts to check transaction ledger completeness against schema expectations.

dspy, frictionless, pydantic. Optimizes narrative compilation prompts to systematically highlight evidence gaps without hallucinations. Local or cloud LLM with strong zero-shot summarization and tabular factual reasoning.

Submit runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, a working interface, example outputs, and a recorded end-to-end demo. Include tests and an action log.

Drafts chronological summaries describing all transactions in the ingested fixture.

Accurately isolates specific transaction IDs lacking mandatory documentary references based on tabular completeness rules.

Generates clean Markdown and JSON output formats ready for senior investigator review.

```json [ { "input": { "case_id": "CASE-1049", "transactions": [ { "tx_id": "TX-01", "amount": 45000, "currency": "EUR", "sender": "Alpha Ltd", "receiver": "Beta SA", "doc_attached": "INV-2023-99" }, { "tx_id": "TX-02", "amount": 42000, "currency": "EUR", "sender": "Beta SA", "receiver": "Gamma Inc", "doc_attached": null } ] }, "expected_output": { "case_id": "CASE-1049", "narrative": "Alpha Ltd transferred 45,000 EUR to Beta SA supported by INV-2023-99. Beta SA subsequently transferred 42,000 EUR to Gamma Inc.", "missing_link_annotations": [ { "tx_id": "TX-02", "missing_field": "doc_attached", "reason": "Missing supporting external documentary reference." } ], "ready_for_review": false } }, { "input": { "case_id": "CASE-1050", "transactions": [ { "tx_id": "TX-03", "amount": 10000, "currency": "USD", "sender": "Acme Corp", "receiver": "Delta LLC", "doc_attached": "PO-8812" } ] }, "expected_output": { "case_id": "CASE-1050", "narrative": "Acme Corp remitted 10,000 USD to Delta LLC verified by purchase order PO-8812.", "missing_link_annotations": [], "ready_for_review": true } } ] ```

Narratives are purely descriptive without accusatory legal claims or regulatory filing triggers. Examples are simplified synthetic app records. Use mock external writes. Require human review before any real deployment.

Rules

Participation guide

Narratives are purely descriptive without accusatory legal claims or regulatory filing triggers. Examples are simplified synthetic app records. Use mock external writes and human review.

Delivery guide

How work is evaluated

Evaluation

Drafts chronological summaries describing all transactions in the ingested fixture. Accurately isolates specific transaction IDs lacking mandatory documentary references based on tabular completeness rules. Generates clean Markdown and JSON output formats ready for senior investigator review.

Submission format

Runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, working interface, example outputs, recorded demo, tests, and action logs.

Datasets

Challenge datasets

Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.

Evaluation rubric

How submissions are scored

These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.

Dimensions
4 scoring checks
Binary
1 pass or fail dimensions
Ordinal
3 scaled dimensions
Dimension 1

Complete workflow

Ingest simplified normalized ledger entries containing sender, receiver, timestamp, and purpose fields. Validate ledger tabular completeness against required schema fields using Frictionless Data, focusing on attachment references. Draft an objective chronological narrative describing the fund flow sequence across all verified accounts. Compile an explicit list of missing-link annotations where tabular records lack corresponding external documentary references.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 2

Correctness and evidence

Drafts chronological summaries describing all transactions in the ingested fixture. Accurately isolates specific transaction IDs lacking mandatory documentary references based on tabular completeness rules. Generates clean Markdown and JSON output formats ready for senior investigator review.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 3

Review interface

A two-pane narrative review window with editable summary paragraphs alongside flagged tabular missing-link annotations.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 4

Safe execution

Narratives are purely descriptive without accusatory legal claims or regulatory filing triggers. Examples are simplified synthetic app records.

Binary check

This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.

Learning goals

What you should walk away with

  • Ingest simplified normalized ledger entries containing sender, receiver, timestamp, and purpose fields.

  • Validate ledger tabular completeness against required schema fields using Frictionless Data, focusing on attachment references.

  • Draft an objective chronological narrative describing the fund flow sequence across all verified accounts.

  • Compile an explicit list of missing-link annotations where tabular records lack corresponding external documentary references.

Resources and assets

Reference links and supporting material

Dataset notes

Generate synthetic business transaction batches with deliberately omitted supporting invoice references and transport documents to test missing-link detection. Supplied starter examples are synthetic, not source extracts.

Challenge setup

Configuration summary for this challenge.

Challenge input

Input details are not configured.

DSPy

Prompt and LM program optimization framework.

Evaluated output

No output checks are configured.

Evaluation checks
  • Ingest simplified normalized ledger entries containing sender, receiver, timestamp, and purpose fields. Val...
  • Drafts chronological summaries describing all transactions in the ingested fixture. Accurately isolates spe...
  • A two-pane narrative review window with editable summary paragraphs alongside flagged tabular missing-link...
Configured evaluation evidence
  • 2 public reference cases
Configured runtime
  • 3 configured tools

Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.

View technical recipe

Configured tools

Action Space
  • DSPy · Optional
Training Infra
  • DSPy · Optional
Orchestration
  • DSPy · Optional

Evaluation contract

  • Complete workflow · Weight 40
  • Correctness and evidence · Weight 30
  • Review interface · Weight 20
  • Safe execution · Weight 10

Reference cases

  • 2 public reference cases

Workflow tasks

No workflow tasks are configured.

Recipe freeze marker

No recipe freeze time is recorded.

Frequently Asked Questions about Build a Chronological Ledger Narrative and Documentary Missing-Link Annotator