Skip to main content
Challenge

Build a Beneficial-Ownership Evidence Retention Review Console

Develop a beneficial-ownership evidence retention and permission review console using explicitly fictional policies. Parse BODS data to verify compliance with mock retention rules and generate structured permission evaluation reports.

CybersecurityHosted by Vera
Challenge brief

What you are building

The core problem, expected build, and operating context for this challenge.

Develop a beneficial-ownership evidence retention and permission review console using explicitly fictional policies. Parse BODS data to verify compliance with mock retention rules and generate structured permission evaluation reports.

KYC onboarding escalation analyst

Parse simplified synthetic BODS v0.4 statements to extract beneficial ownership declarations and attached evidence document metadata.

Evaluate evidence records against explicitly fictional data retention rules and mock permission schemas.

Identify documents exceeding mock retention limits or lacking required user access level justifications.

Synthesize a structured permission review report detailing non-compliant records and recommended access revocation actions.

Split-screen dashboard displaying evidence retention flags on the left and generated permission review reports on the right.

Generate simplified synthetic BODS statement packages in JSON format modeling multi-tiered holding companies and attached evidence metadata with fictional retention attributes. Starter examples below are synthetic. They are not downloaded records.

Beneficial Ownership Data Standard Extracts BODS v0.4 data modeling concepts for beneficial ownership declarations and entity relationship links.

langgraph, pydantic, fastapi. Manages complex state transitions across evidence parsing, mock policy evaluation, and report generation. Fast hosted model or local Ollama instance capable of evaluating document metadata against structured mock policies and drafting clear reports.

Submit runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, a working interface, example outputs, and a recorded end-to-end demo. Include tests and an action log.

Validates retention dates against fictional policy limits and identifies violations.

Flags documents with unauthorized access according to mock permission schemas.

Outputs a structured JSON report of retention violations and recommended actions.

```json [ { "input": { "subject_entity": "Atlas Logistics Holdings", "evidence_records": [ { "doc_id": "doc1", "type": "passport", "retention_days": 400, "access_level": "admin" }, { "doc_id": "doc2", "type": "utility_bill", "retention_days": 150, "access_level": "user" } ], "mock_policy": { "max_retention_days": 365, "required_access": "admin" } }, "expected_output": { "subject_entity": "Atlas Logistics Holdings", "violations": [ { "doc_id": "doc1", "reason": "Exceeds max_retention_days" }, { "doc_id": "doc2", "reason": "Insufficient access_level" } ], "compliance_status": "failed", "recommended_actions": [ "Revoke or delete doc1", "Update access for doc2" ] } }, { "input": { "subject_entity": "Direct Green Energy SA", "evidence_records": [ { "doc_id": "doc3", "type": "incorporation_certificate", "retention_days": 100, "access_level": "admin" } ], "mock_policy": { "max_retention_days": 365, "required_access": "admin" } }, "expected_output": { "subject_entity": "Direct Green Energy SA", "violations": [], "compliance_status": "passed", "recommended_actions": [] } } ] ```

Performs read-only mock policy audits on simplified synthetic app records; uses explicitly fictional policies for compliance checks. Use mock external writes. Require human review before any real deployment.

Rules

Participation guide

Performs read-only mock policy audits on simplified synthetic app records; uses explicitly fictional policies for compliance checks. Use mock external writes and human review.

Delivery guide

How work is evaluated

Evaluation

Validates retention dates against fictional policy limits and identifies violations. Flags documents with unauthorized access according to mock permission schemas. Outputs a structured JSON report of retention violations and recommended actions.

Submission format

Runnable source, pinned dependencies, setup commands, working interface, example outputs, recorded demo, tests, and action logs.

Datasets

Challenge datasets

Public datasets, plus the private datasets you have access to.

Evaluation rubric

How submissions are scored

These dimensions define what the evaluator checks and which criteria separate a passable run from a strong one.

Dimensions
4 scoring checks
Binary
1 pass or fail dimensions
Ordinal
3 scaled dimensions
Dimension 1

Complete workflow

Parse simplified synthetic BODS v0.4 statements to extract beneficial ownership declarations and attached evidence document metadata. Evaluate evidence records against explicitly fictional data retention rules and mock permission schemas. Identify documents exceeding mock retention limits or lacking required user access level justifications. Synthesize a structured permission review report detailing non-compliant records and recommended access revocation actions.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 2

Correctness and evidence

Validates retention dates against fictional policy limits and identifies violations. Flags documents with unauthorized access according to mock permission schemas. Outputs a structured JSON report of retention violations and recommended actions.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 3

Review interface

Split-screen dashboard displaying evidence retention flags on the left and generated permission review reports on the right.

Score scale
012
Score 0

Missing or incorrect.

Score 1

Partly complete, with documented gaps.

Score 2

Complete, with reproducible evidence.

Dimension 4

Safe execution

Performs read-only mock policy audits on simplified synthetic app records; uses explicitly fictional policies for compliance checks.

Binary check

This dimension contributes its full weight only when the submission satisfies the requirement. Partial credit is not awarded.

Learning goals

What you should walk away with

  • Parse simplified synthetic BODS v0.4 statements to extract beneficial ownership declarations and attached evidence document metadata.

  • Evaluate evidence records against explicitly fictional data retention rules and mock permission schemas.

  • Identify documents exceeding mock retention limits or lacking required user access level justifications.

  • Synthesize a structured permission review report detailing non-compliant records and recommended access revocation actions.

Resources and assets

Reference links and supporting material

Dataset notes

Generate simplified synthetic BODS statement packages in JSON format modeling multi-tiered holding companies and attached evidence metadata with fictional retention attributes. Supplied starter examples are synthetic, not source extracts.

Challenge setup

Configuration summary for this challenge.

Challenge input

Input details are not configured.

LangGraph

Runtime for stateful agent workflows.

Evaluated output

No output checks are configured.

Evaluation checks
  • Parse simplified synthetic BODS v0.4 statements to extract beneficial ownership declarations and attached e...
  • Validates retention dates against fictional policy limits and identifies violations. Flags documents with u...
  • Split-screen dashboard displaying evidence retention flags on the left and generated permission review repo...
Configured evaluation evidence
  • 2 public reference cases
Configured runtime
  • 2 configured tools

Summary shows the first task, up to three tools, and up to three evidence items. Open the technical recipe to view all configured items.

View technical recipe

Configured tools

Action Space
  • LangGraph · Optional
Orchestration
  • LangGraph · Optional

Evaluation contract

  • Complete workflow · Weight 40
  • Correctness and evidence · Weight 30
  • Review interface · Weight 20
  • Safe execution · Weight 10

Reference cases

  • 2 public reference cases

Workflow tasks

No workflow tasks are configured.

Recipe freeze marker

No recipe freeze time is recorded.

Frequently Asked Questions about Build a Beneficial-Ownership Evidence Retention Review Console